A reply to Professor Seedhouse.
نویسنده
چکیده
This brief reply gives a few references and clarifies some points in order to emphasize that a number of Professor Seedhouse's assertions are debatable and that his criticism of slovenly scholarship and his unbridled ad hominem argumentation are out of place and easily refuted.
منابع مشابه
Camouflage is no defence--a response to Kottow.
The author responds to Professor Kottow's criticisms, explaining numerous errors and misconceptions.
متن کاملA reply to Professor Dixon’s comments on the Productivity Commission’s modelling of automotive assistance
In his article, Professor Peter Dixon largely reiterates arguments made in earlier papers (Dixon and Rimmer 2008 and Dixon 2008), which formed part of consultancy reports, including for Lateral Economics (LE 2008). The Commission has responded to his criticisms in two technical supplements (PC 2008b, 2008c) to its June 2008 report Modelling Economy-wide Effects of Future Automotive Assistance (...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of medical ethics
دوره 25 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999